Thanks Winsor. I don't have sharpening on. The images look very good and
they won't take as much sharpening as I give my slide scans. At the
moment, I prefer digital images made from slides. I can't quite figure out
why. There seems to be more "tooth" to the image and more of a sense of
depth and dimension.
But I hadn't expected to give up slides, quite the opposite. I just want
to see how far this little shooter can go, and it looks quite
promising. It is both harder and easier to use than a film camera.
Joel W.
At 09:34 AM 8/6/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>It sounds like you are on the right track. Most converters have a
>default that applies the in camera settings automatically. My
>experience is that the camera gets the white balance right most of the
>time, although I sometimes have to move the warmth slider a bit on a
>cloudy day. Not accurate, but more pleasing. My recommendation is that
>unless you are shooting jpeg to turn off sharpening in the camera and
>do it all in Photoshop. Your images will end up being lots more natural
>looking, or at least more film like.
>
>
>Winsor
>Long Beach, CA
>USA
>On Aug 6, 2004, at 8:17 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|