Guilty - but it wasn't me who framed the picture.
But in this one http://www.hemy.me.uk/Scales/Image20.jpg I am the one who
couldn't wait to peek at my film before it was sent for processing :-(
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Moose
Sent: 06 August 2004 06:20
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: cleaning negatives
Is that you who were too short to get your entire face in the photo?
I agree that the cleanup by ICE is exceptional, and more than justified on
this image. On the other hand, it has clearly decreased sharpness, even in a
reduced size JPEG, so I wouldn't want to use it on anything but troubled
images. I'd rather do a bit of spotting on any image I like than soften it.
Moose
Piers Hemy wrote:
>I have had some stunning success scanning pre-1960 Kodachromes *with
>ICE* in that the fungus and scratches simply vanish without obvious
>harm to the rest of the image. But there have been some frames where
>the use of IC has introduced a colour shift which is not pleasant.
>http://www.hemy.me.uk/Scales/Image10.jpg
>http://www.hemy.me.uk/Scales/Image11.jpg
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
