Subject: | [OM] Re: Oh, Digital, Wherefore Art Thou? |
---|---|
From: | Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:32:36 +0100 |
That may be rule #2 Piers; but rule no 3 invalidates no 2 if one of the prepositions was superfluous in the first place ... ;-) Chris On 29 Jul 2004, at 19:45, Piers Hemy wrote: > > That is rule #1. > > Rule #2 says Rule #1 does not apply if you use two prepositions to > finish a > sentence up with. > > You passed the test. > > ;-) > > Piers <|_:-)_|> C M I Barker Cambridgeshire, Great Britain. +44 (0)7092 251126 ftog at threeshoes.co.uk http://www.threeshoes.co.uk http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko ... a nascent photo library. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: alternative for the olympus 35-70 F4, Johnny Johnson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Photoshop, Chris Barker |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Oh, Digital, Wherefore Art Thou?, AG Schnozz |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Oh, Digital, Wherefore Art Thou?, Timpe, Jim |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |