Subject: | [OM] Re: Oh, Digital, Wherefore Art Thou? |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:13:42 -0700 |
I think that is more than adequate dpi. In one of Reichmann's articles comparing film and digital he complained about criticisms that he used an Imacon film scanner. With much grousing he bought a professional drum scan and there was not much difference. Another time he compared a Polaroid 4000dpi against a 5600dpi Imacon and I did not see a huge difference in his examples. He apparently liked the Imacon enough to get one with lower resolution. Apparently you are getting just about everything possible out of a current 35mm color frame with about 4000 dpi. You are covered for future developments though. http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/scanners/ imacon_comparison.shtml Winsor Long Beach, California USA On Jul 29, 2004, at 10:18 AM, Walt Wayman wrote: > The highest resolution scan I am capable of making is 5400 d.p.i. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Oh, Digital, Wherefore Art Thou?, Walt Wayman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Oh, Digital, Wherefore Art Thou?, Walt Wayman |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Oh, Digital, Wherefore Art Thou?, Walt Wayman |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Oh, Digital, Wherefore Art Thou?, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |