Have you checked? You don't really see much with ordinary exposures.
Take a picture of a clear sky with a very small aperture like F22. Load
it into Photoshop and use levels to increase the contrast. You will be
amazed.
Winsor
Long Beach, California
USA
On Jul 28, 2004, at 6:57 AM, W Shumaker wrote:
> I don't have enough data yet to know. Eventually there is something
> that collects the dust that will have to be replaced, and it may take
> a few years before that happens. I change lenses all the time, use the
> OM adapter, extension tube, etc. But I'm also paranoid, change lenses
> quickly and try to be careful. Even so, looking in I can see dust
> particles
> on the mirror, but none in my images, yet.
>
> I always wonder about the 50-200 zoom, zooming out the lens
> has to suck in a lot air, like a pump.
>
> Wayne
>
> At 08:24 AM 7/28/2004, Matt asked:
>
>> How well does the ultrasonic dust removal scheme work? I was
>> discussing
>> the E1 with a colleague today, and it got me thinking about it.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|