To evaluate sharpness, I think you need to use something other than a
mass produced slide designed for color control. It is entirely likely
that the original slide isn't all that sharp. Kodak isn't spending a lot
of extra effort and cost on something that isn't part of the product.
They have other products for that. If you have a decent microscope, you
could check the slide itself.
Moose
James Royall wrote:
>The other question I've been asking myself is whether the scan should
>be sharper. The detail image shows actual pixels from the scan. Does
>this look about right for 4000dpi, or should it be sharper? Obviously
>some detail is lost in the jpg, but it does look virtually
>indistinguishable from the original tif.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|