on 6/3/04 7:55 PM, Moose at olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I made no claim whatsoever about whether the SP 60-300 is better than
> any lens other than opining that it is likely better than a couple of
> specific mid-70s zooms. I have no idea how it performs relative to your
> Sigma. I do know that it is a very good performer on its own both from
> my own experience and from the experience of others I trust.
>
> Moose
I volunteer, again, to test lenses for people in and independent way, if
anyone wants to know if their Zuiko 350/2.8 is better or worse than a Tamron
300/2.8 or Tamron 400/4.0, just send them to me, be sure to allow me enough
time to throughly test them both and organize the results (2-3 years seems
reasonable) and I'll report the test results back. Glad I can be of help to
you all...! I'll even pay for the film myself.
--
Jim Brokaw
OM-'s of all sorts, and no OM-oney...
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|