| Subject: | [OM] Re: Tamron lens (was... |
|---|---|
| From: | Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 04 Jun 2004 10:29:14 -0700 |
OK, now that I've been set straight about the 35~80 (thanks!) anyone care to enlighten me about the different models of the 300/2.8? Didn't someone in this thread mention 3 models? Is one more desirable than the others? Mike ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: E-1 discussion, Wilcox, Joel F |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Tamron lens (was..., Piers Hemy |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [mju anyway] - Yes I still use Oly dammit!, Garry D. Lewis |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Tamron lens (was..., Piers Hemy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |