Agreed.
I was trying to address the point Jez brought up. That being, his desire
to not have to do any post processing and associated decision making,
especially given his acknowledged problems with viewing colors.
Maybe I misunderstood what he was looking for. It sounded like he wanted
images straight out of the camera to be "good" and hopefully directly
printable. Getting the white balance correct up front would get him a
long way toward that goal and the camera will do the work for him...
--
Jim
Winsor Crosby wrote:
> "White balance is everything when shooting digital" is only true if you
> are not shooting raw which allows you to set the white balance after
> the fact. White balance, like the other settings, are saved as a
> separate file and only applied, or not, during the raw conversion.
> Shooting 8 bit images is a bit like tying one arm behind your back.
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, CA
> USA
> On Jun 3, 2004, at 1:29 PM, Sharp Consulting wrote:
>
>
>>From what I've seen so far with my D100 and the 990 I had before that,
>>initial white balance is *everything* when shooting a digital. If you
>>can set it for the light you're shooting in you can get "good" color.
>>If you can't because of the situation or the scene, the results will
>>be spotty and require work in photoshop.
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|