>
>Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 09:16:09 -0400
>From: Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [OM] E-1 discussion
>
> >Here are Phil Askey's comments, which, as I have used the camera
>>extensively over three days, I couldn't agree with more...
>>
> > *If you're going to be critical (and I normally am) you see a
> >superbly designed camera which isn't achieving its full potential."*
>
>While all this may well be true, it's also irrelevant to the present
>discussion, which is about the images and the tradeoff between
>resolution, color fidelity and noise. (I'm sure the E-2 will be
>better, etc.) Actually, it's about trying to figure out why the E-1
>photos look better than 10D photos to at least one experienced
>photographer, CH. The hope is to figure out what the important
>technical differences leading to this are. This will include the
>post-capture processing. One can do the same for 10D pictures, using
>you as the experienced photographer. At the end of the day, we want
>to know which technical issues really matter, and how does the story
>change for different kinds of subjects, and for various photographers.
>Joe Gwinn
At the end of the day what most of us want is to make beautiful images.
-Stephen.
--
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|