OK. Good point that there shouldn't be too many differences between
slides. I hadn't thought that one through properly. Admittedly was with
the Superia that I've had probs, though with Provia I think greens come
out looking pretty dull compared to the slide.
James
On 27 May 2004, at 9:03 pm, Winsor Crosby wrote:
>
> I always assumed that the differences in slide film, for scanning
> purposes, are small compared to color negative films with their various
> masks. After all when you scan a slide you are trying to get what you
> see on the slide and varying curves should not be necessary unless you
> are trying to change that look. You would change film if you wanted to
> do that. I think the special Kodachrome setting is there because of
> the special problems with scanning that film.
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California
> USA
> On May 27, 2004, at 11:45 AM, James Royall wrote:
>
>> This is my one gripe with the software (along with not being able to
>> batch preview). Choose slide film and there is only generic and Kodak.
>> Choose colour neg and Fuji shows no Superia of any sort. Choose B/W
>> neg
>> and the only Ilford choice is XP2. That means that of all the film
>> I've
>> used in the last year only the last roll I've had developed (XP2) has
>> a
>> profile. I'm using Fuji and Ilford, so very mainstream. It seems to me
>> a real hole in his updating of the software. Maybe black and white
>> could be overlooked but having no Fuji slide film just seems odd -
>> what
>> percentage of the market does Fuji have?
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|