Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: scanning print negatives and scanner exposure inconsistencies

Subject: [OM] Re: scanning print negatives and scanner exposure inconsistencies
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 13:03:06 -0700
I always assumed that the differences in slide film, for scanning 
purposes, are small compared to color negative films with their various 
masks. After all when you scan a slide you are trying to get what you 
see on the slide and varying curves should not be necessary unless you 
are trying to change that look. You would change film if you wanted to 
do that. I think the special Kodachrome  setting is there because of 
the special problems with scanning that film.



Winsor
Long Beach, California
USA
On May 27, 2004, at 11:45 AM, James Royall wrote:

> This is my one gripe with the software (along with not being able to
> batch preview). Choose slide film and there is only generic and Kodak.
> Choose colour neg and Fuji shows no Superia of any sort. Choose B/W neg
> and the only Ilford choice is XP2. That means that of all the film I've
> used in the last year only the last roll I've had developed (XP2) has a
> profile. I'm using Fuji and Ilford, so very mainstream. It seems to me
> a real hole in his updating of the software. Maybe black and white
> could be overlooked but having no Fuji slide film just seems odd - what
> percentage of the market does Fuji have?


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz