| Subject: | [OM] Re: Paris panOraMa |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Gullen <andrew.gullen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 03 May 2004 21:49:03 -0400 |
Oh, right. Missed that. It is a little distracting now that I see it - perhaps a bit of digital sharpening could mask it. Andrew on 2004/05/03 8:10 PM, Alex Drotschmann at distinctivedeal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Picture 2 or so moving along from left to right is clearly less focused than > the one to the right and left of it you can see the difference in the > picture. All others fit very well, but that one kinda ruins the otherwise > great work. > > From: "Andrew Gullen" <andrew.gullen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [OM] Re: Paris panOraMa >> >> Cool. On casual inspection I don't see the joins. The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Lots of OM photos, Andrew Gullen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Problem with exposure times on OM-2n, Andrew Gullen |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Paris panOraMa, Alex Drotschmann |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Paris panOraMa, Alex Drotschmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |