If it's not a fresh body, it's a mooshed & dented D100 - It stands
slightly shorter & thinner than the D100, but also the "shoulders" (for
lack of better describing words) of the camera, with the prism in the
middle, are more curved. The only film bodies that look similar are the
F65 or F75/F55, but these are a far bit different & smaller. There's a
body design comparison on DPreview.com
Daniel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf
> Of Tom Scales
> Sent: Sunday, 25 April 2004 15:33
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: Big Cameras (Re: Scan OM/film or get digital
camera?)
>
>
> You sure the D70 is no a fresh body?
>
> All I know is that the D100 works flawlessly and fits just fine.
>
> Tom
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Tan" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 12:25 AM
> Subject: [OM] Re: Big Cameras (Re: Scan OM/film or get digital
camera?)
>
>
> >
> > I guess the Fuji S2Pro and the Kodak 14N were severely limited in
their
> > body design due to Nikon's specifications - They would only allow
Fuji
> > and Kodak to build on the F80 body. It looks to me that the D2H (I
> > think?) and the D70 are the only dslr Nikons so far that are a
> > completely new design. It would be far simpler (and cheaper of
course!)
> > to take an existing frame and build into it than to restart from
> > scratch. But I guess that a major factor would be to keep existing
35mm
> > body users happy with a familiar design rather than a radical new
> > design.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
>
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
> mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|