Just read my own post and it makes no sense. Sorry. My eldest is getting
married in the morn, and I'm a little bit off kilter today.
I won't even try interpreting what I wrote.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Timpe, Jim [mailto:Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 1:54 PM
>To: 'olympus@xxxxxxxxxx'
>Subject: [OM] Re: Scan OM/film or get digital camera?
>
>
>
>>Judging from all the photographs I've seen of pro-level
>>digital cameras, they all look awfully large, bulky -- and
>>supremely ugly -- to me.
>>
>>-
>>-----------------------------------------------------------
>>les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
>>-----------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
>You've nailed it, Les. I've got screen savers and wallpaper images of
>various OM bodies and Zuikos, the thought has not, nor would
>it, to do the
>same with any of the digital pixelbricks I've seen.
>
>The OM s and many of the Zuikos are pieces of modern (recent?) art....
>
>The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
>To contact the list admins:
>mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List >Problem"
>
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|