Subject: | [OM] Re: Scan OM/film or get digital camera? |
---|---|
From: | "IanG" <I@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 23 Apr 2004 20:01:45 +0100 |
A 28mm Zuiko looks kind of cute on it :-) -----Original Message----- From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Timpe, Jim Sent: 23 April 2004 19:11 To: 'olympus@xxxxxxxxxx' Subject: [OM] Re: Scan OM/film or get digital camera? Wrong again... Both 8^0 > > > > >Nope, broke. > >- >You're sick. > >> The Canon 1D MkII arrived a couple of hours ago... > > > The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] A hit for RAW file shooting, Skip Williams |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: justification for keeping auto tubes ?, Piers Hemy |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Scan OM/film or get digital camera?, Timpe, Jim |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Scan OM/film or get digital camera?, Timpe, Jim |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |