Hi Richard:
as I stated in my reply to Tom- There is nothing to link the OM to the E1
other than name. To expect loyalty or conjunctivity is really climbing up a
rope, I don't think it has anything to do with Oly stopping the OM, it is
two totally different technologies and there is no bridge.
Gord
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>; <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 9:52 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: Hate to beat a dead horse - E1 users?
> At 10:46 AM 3/30/2004 -0500, Skip Williams wrote:
>
> >You know I'm on that bandwagon.
>
> I was hoping for more enthusiastic responses amongst my Zuikoholic friends
> :-). I guess the abandonment of the OM line really hurt this lot!
>
> To be honest, my choices of the E1 and the *istD also have to do with my
go
> for the innovative small guys and the anti-big company mentality. That
> plus, well, I hate to bring up the B word, but I hate the Bokeh of the
> Nikon glass, at least on the samples I have seen. I was a FM user way back
> when.
>
> Canon is of course a safe choice, when all said and done. Decision,
decision.
>
> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please
> use richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|