Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Oly IS; was: Why E1 over others?

Subject: [OM] Re: Oly IS; was: Why E1 over others?
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 18:14:00 -0800
I think it was more than just licensing. The 2100uz lens is pretty 
obviously the same lens as the Can*n Pro90. I believe they bought lens 
with IS from Can*n.

Moose

pelaughlin@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>At 08:26 AM 3/30/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>  
>
>>The only digital camera I own is an Oly 2100 UZ ..........
>>Anyone know the story behind why Olympus didn't continue with IS technology,
>>since they had it at one time?
>>Greg
>>    
>>
>For one thing, Olympus did not own the IS technology used in those 
>cameras.  Canon did.  Probably a money factor there or something.
>Paul in Portland OR
>  
>


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"
        

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz