Subject: | [OM] Re: Why E1 over others? |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:18:46 +1000 |
> C.H.Ling <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > down is not a problem for them too. My shooting result proof it > works: > > http://www.accura.com.hk/Zuiko/Flower.htm > > To see some more: > > http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/DC.htm > Looks like a pretty convincing argument to me ! ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Oly IS; was: Why E1 over others?, Piers Hemy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Why E1 over others?, Wayne Harridge |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why E1 over others?, Walt Wayman |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why E1 over others?, Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |