Thanks again, they are on my list for this weekend :-) Then I plan to shoot
as I have only one more day's access to the college dark room before the
course if over.
Regards
Al
----- Original Message -----
From: <ClassicVW@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 2:58 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: OM-4 Purchase (new to list)
>
> Yes, I think there's some confusion here.
> My Energizer 357s state on the front of the package:
>
> Energizer
> 357
> (SR44W/313)
> HIGH DRAIN 1.55V
> silver oxide
>
> so, I assume you need to see "313" and not "303" for it to be rated for
high
> drain usage, or maybe, as John said, a 303 is thinner by 1mm. Maybe it's
the
> "high drain" rating, or maybe the size, or both. It certainly may make a
> difference.
>
> George S.
>
>
>
> olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> > Yeah, I never carry around just one spare set unless I have tested them,
> > although I've never had a problem with Energizers 357s..
> >
> > Also, the 303 is a low current rated cell. According to a lengthy post
> > by Tim Hughes some time ago, when he was researching batteries for new
> > product development, some batteries sold as 303s may be 357 equivalents,
> > thus causeing some possible confusion as to whether they, in their true
> > form, are adequate to high drain camera application.
>
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|