Subject: | [OM] Re: When you talk 50mm lens performance, define the lens! - was The Harrison Ross Poll |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:16:27 -0800 |
Not really bashing you, just too many posts at once referring to performance of 50/1.4s without saying which ones. I can just see some newbie buying an old silvernose and expecting a great lens because of comments about a late, great one - or vice-versa. Moose edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >I also have a miJ for comparison. Don't know the sn of my 1.4. > >Earl > The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Epson 2200 Printer Sucks!, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Cosgrove Northamptonshire, Graham Battison |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: When you talk 50mm lens performance, define the lens! - was The Harrison Ross Poll, Earl Dunbar |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: When you talk 50mm lens performance, define the lens! - was The Harrison Ross Poll, Earl Dunbar |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |