This <http://brashear.phys.appstate.edu/lhawkins/photo/crash-test.txt>
will likely be of interest. Assuming John is correct, and he knows a
vast amount more about this than I do, the 4 should be equally well
sealed and resistant. I also remember someone posting about finding a
4T(i) awash in water in their camera bag with no negative consequences.
Not recommended, but reassuring.
Moose
johan.malmstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Is the OM-4Ti more reliable than the plain 4 in rough conditions? I think
>John H stated some time ago that there is no difference in sealing between
>them. Would you trust any of them in a cold an humid place? I'm thinking of
>taking it on my ski-trip. The normal conditions on this trip would be
>temperatures below 0 C and probably not dry at all... Actually this years
>trip is more easy than earlier years, we will actually stay in cabins/huts
>instead of the usual Hilleberg. But this means that camera will be exposed
>to indoor-climate once a day which probably means more moisture and
>humidity. I will take my OM-1n but thinking of taking another OM-body with
>me. Thoughts on this, share your experience!
>
>/ Johan
>
>
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|