Happy to do it. Surprisingly, the cost per print is actually cheaper ( for
the same size print), perhaps because one ink cartridge holds 220ml!
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:57 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: Epson 2200 printer sucks!
> Way to go, Tom.
>
> My test print for the 2200, chosen sort of at random, is the tranny that
was my TOPE 8 shot, because of some pretty subtle colors, and because it's
sharper than it appears when reduced to a TOPE-size jpg.
>
> http://www.tope.nl/tope8/pictures/tope8_5.jpg
>
> I've got two Cibachrome prints of this slide, one 11x14 and one 14x17.
Except for a tiny shift in color and little loss of contrast here and there,
the Epson print is pretty darn close. I expect to be able to fix that. But
even if I can't, I'll be satisfied.
>
> If I get something so good I need a 24x36 print, I'll personally bring it
up to Harrisburg and beg you to let me watch you print it. :-)
>
> Walt
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|
