Hi Winsor:
Good to know. But as I stated, the Kodak and Ilford are the best for the
R300. The inks are not Ultrachrome on the R300.
I just came with 4 test prints from a local lab. I took the same files I've
been usig as test for all my papers and calibrations. They printed them on
real photo paper with chemical processing. The prints are way superior to my
R300 plus a lot cheaper too. I paid $1.25 per 8 X 11 prints 8-O.
The only drawback is that I get no therapeutic relaxation the same as when I
do my own printing..;-)
peace
David
>
> Bad advice for a 2200. It is a completely different animal. Kodak paper
> sucks big time on a 2200. Horrible black smears across the image. Been
> there.
>
> Stick to Epson recommendations. They are wonderful papers and on them
> the images have the long life promised for the Ultrachrome inks.
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California
> USA
> On Mar 22, 2004, at 9:25 AM, cochran@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|