Hi Joe:
As per Rob Harrison's idea of subj. evaluation, what is the fascination for
the 'press lens', 'pancake lens' I am not being sarcastic, I am not familiar
with it and would like to know if it is its rarity or it's delectability
that commands 3 to 4 times the price I would look at for a 35/2.0?
Prices seem to have taken a dip (may not be permanent) as I just got a
16/3.5 fisheye with covers and case in (I would even call mint condition)
for $550. and I just 'won' a 180/2.8 for $435. I know why I wanted them,
and what I would replace as witnessed by my posting of items for sale. I am
a zuikoholic, but I do have a game plan of equipment that I will use and
some propriety (ok not that much- but some) over what I have in 'inventory'
at any given time. I can concur with Rob that the self test method is
expensive, as that is what I have done, but you can't read about a lens
and know what you want or need you just have to go there. So back to my
specific question - what is 'there' re: the 40/2.0 ?
Gord
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Ascione" > I know I thought it was going for too low and I
figured if I put a bid I
> thought wouldn't win, it would satisfy my need to bid. I know it is as
> is but it is represented as one owner with no scratches. Such is life.
> Joe
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|