Subject: | [OM] Re: Olympus image stabilization, was: E-1 review |
---|---|
From: | Paul Laughlin <pelaughlin@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:59:21 -0800 |
At 07:58 AM 3/18/2004 -0500, you wrote: >I did a brief search yesterday on uspto.gov looking for any Olympus >patent on image stabilization and came up with nothing. On the other >hand, I got the same result for Minolta. Some IS patents may be too new >to have issued. Minolta may also have bought rights to their anti-shake >system from someone else. Olympus used the Canon setup in the C-2100UZ. I don't believe they have an image stabilization of their own. I also believe that is the reason they have not pursued the use of it. The C-2100UZ is a very impressive camera for a 2MP camera. I have printed 12 x 18 images from it with very nice results on my Epson 1270 printer. Paul in Portland OR The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: TOPE 17 - 1 new entry and event closure, Olaf Greve |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: **SPAM** Re: Why go digital??, SAS Teachers |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Olympus image stabilization, was: E-1 review, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Woe is Me - and Why Go Digital?, AG Schnozz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |