Subject: | [OM] Re: E-1 review |
---|---|
From: | W Shumaker <om4t@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:02:19 -0500 |
Unfortunately all the speculation does not change the fact that there are no "known" plans to provide image stabilization in the E-system. Which will unfortunately put them behind the C*non and N*kon curve. Wayne Chuck wrote: ><snip> On the other hand, if Olympus has >plans for implementing anti-shake via compensating sensor motions they >will have compicated their lives considerably if both functions can't be >performed by the same device. .... The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: What is "Bid Siphoning"? Ane why is it Heinous?, Parzival Herzog |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Why go digital??, C.H.Ling |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-1 review, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-1 review, SAS Teachers |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |