Yes. Normally I would have binned the neg immediately, but didn't for
some reason.
Incidentally, that wasn't expired film. It was a perfectly good roll of
Kodak BW400 :p
Daniel Tan (on a new email address, which is why I've probably missed a
few replies.)
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Moose
Sent: Sunday, 14 March 2004 17:30
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Copying Wayne Harridge :-P
daniel.tan@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
><>
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2202996&photo_sel_index=0#p
hoto
<http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2202996&photo_sel_index=0#p
hoto>
>
>Yes, it's badly panned. Yes, it's slightly out of focus. Yes, it's not
>technically a good shot. And yes, that is a speck of dust on the right
>hand side (didn't get around to cleaning the neg/scan). Thoughts?
>Suggestions?
>
Perfect use for that way out of date film. For images like this (and I
say not good or bad) any film in odd shape might even add to the effect.
It's not an image I would keep if I took it. But I do understand that my
taste not everyone's. I have seen this kind of image appreciated by
others.It does have a certain mystery if one wonders what he may be
doing/hiding if not simply avoiding having his picture taken.
Moose
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins:
mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|