Subject: | [OM] Re: Woe is Me - Bridge Camera Fallout |
---|---|
From: | Earl Dunbar <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:55:02 -0500 |
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=6310479 Wayne Harridge wrote: > > > > > > > Jez.Cunningham@xxxxxxxxxx <Jez.Cunningham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > I should add something else - the need for wide-angle lenses is more > > and > > more addressed by stitching multiple exposures together... > > Revolutionary! > > Ok for static subjects, not useful when any part of the subject moves between > exposures. > > Wayne Harridge > > http://lrh.structuregraphs.com > > The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus > List Problem" The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Auxilliary Lenses for Oly Rangefinders, Earl Dunbar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: OM is the SAAB of Photography?, Ali Shah |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Woe is Me - Bridge Camera Fallout, Wayne Harridge |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Woe is Me - Bridge Camera Fallout, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |