HI Gord:
????????????? :-|, eh, :-O.....Don't scare me..:-O :-|
You are pulling my leg now?!!
I am saving this message as a BINDING CONTRACT between us ...LOL
Are you serious?
I WANT IT!!!!
peace
David
>
> Hi David:
>
> You are right! Why didn't I see that. The 100 has 15 more mm and it has .8
> more stop. But the 85 that I have is too new, not even broken in, I bought
> it with a tip from George from a Swiss Photographer called Lutz. (obviously
> born to be a photog) and brought it over from Europe as it is so smooth and
> shiney. But since you have clearly demonstrated the folly of having it -
> would $85.00 be asking too much?
>
> Gord
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Cochran" <cochran@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 5:07 AM
> Subject: [OM] Re: 85/2 vs 90/2 vs 35-105
>
>
>> Hi Gord:
>>
>> Keep your 100mm/2.8 and 50mm/3.5 and by all means sell me your 85/2.0 .
>> You dont need that 85mm it is closer to the 90mm than the other two. Dont
>> delay and follow my advice! ;-)
>>
>> peace
>>
>> david
>>>
>>> Hi Z's
>>>
>>> While we're on this thread...I'm considering a 90mm macro, but I would
> then
>>> sell my 100mm/2.8 and my 50mm/3.5. I would keep my 85mm/2.0. Good
> trade-off?
>>> What is the opinion, is my rationale sound?
>>>
>>> Gord
>>
>>
>> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>>
>> To contact the list admins:
> mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
> List Problem"
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|