Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Camera Quandary - OM vs. N*kon vs L*ica

Subject: [OM] Re: Camera Quandary - OM vs. N*kon vs L*ica
From: "Roger D. Key" <rdk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:52:19 +0100

I do not have any lenses at work to check, but I seem to remember that the
50/1.8 lenses marked 'MC' only say Japan, and have the serial no. next to
the lens mount. The MC-marked lenses do not have as many elements
multi-coated as the later MiJ lenses I believe.

Roger Key



Carlos wrote:

Ok now I'm confused.
my two 50mm 1.8s have the serial #s on the back closest to the camera
and say Japan on the front (not made in Japan)
are these the old or new??

Moose wrote:

>
> You mention lenses again below, but never tell us what Zuiko 50/1.8 you
> have. It can make a huge difference. If you bought yours in 1976, it's
> just not fair to compare it to a modern ASPH Summiron. They made
> millions of 50/1.8s over many years and there were at least 5 design
> changes over that time. My original 1973 version is not a stellar
> performer, ok for snapshots, but....... The last series are called "miJ"
> here because the serial number, which was on the front ring on all
> earlier versions and the 'made in Japan' designation, which was back on
> the rear, switched places on these lenses. This latest version is a
> really good lens, conpetitive with any 50mm out there. The miJ Zuiko
> outperformed a Summicron-M 50/2  in Gary's tests.







The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz