This was my thought when 4/3 was introduced. For years, 35mm format was
considered inadeqate for serious work. As equipment and film improved, it was
accepted as a serious tool.
James Royall wrote:
>
> Just a thought on the 4/3 standard - maybe Olympus & Co have got it
> right and are taking the long view on sensor size. It seems true that
> in the next couple of years 4/3 may be disadvantaged in trying to fit
> enough noise free pixels in the area, but what about in 5 years + ?
> Sensor size will be able to decrease and Olympus will have an
> established lens and body system in place. Others will have needlessly
> bulky bodies and lenses.
>
> James
>
>
> On 13 Feb 2004, at 2:33 pm, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
> > see:
> > <http://www.dpreview.com/news/0402/04021304morejoinfourthirds.asp>
> >
> > Chuck Norcutt
> >
> >
> > The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> >
> > To contact the list admins:
> > mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
> >
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
> List Problem"
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|