Looks great. Your opinion about t-max seems to fit right in with other
comments I have heard.
Charles
Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas wrote:
>Hi, Charles and all.
>
>
>
>>I have been using Tri-X for my Black and White photography, and a little
>>plus-x now and then. I've been seeing very good prices on T-Max and was
>>wondering what you all thought of it?
>>
>>
>
>My situation is the opposite: I was using T-Max 400 (TMY), but once I tried
>the Tri-X... I forgot TMY forever! Tri-X is great up to ISO 1600, and can
>be pushed even more.
>
>Also tried T-Max 100 (TMX), but I think it has very little detail on
>shadows. With its specific T-Max developer, it seems to improve a bit, but
>I still prefer Delta 100 soaked on Ilfotec DD-X -- I don't like the tonal
>scale of FP4, either.
>
>BTW, Ilfotec DD-X is a *superb* developer -- well worth its cost. And it
>does a stunning job with Tri-X, rendering finer grain than usual. See, for
>instance, my TOPE 13 entry:
><http://www.millennics.com/olympus/tope/tope_show_entry.php?event=13&pic=12>
>
>Enjoy,
>
>...
>
>Carlos J. Santisteban
>
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|