Subject: | Re: [OM] 100 vs 85 (was Another Canadian New to Olympus) |
---|---|
From: | Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 04 Jan 2004 16:49:01 -0800 |
> > >I'm not at all rich, but when I was really dirt poor, photographic life >was easier in many ways -- one body, a couple of lenses, and I made good >pictures about as often as I do now........ > I was thinking the same thing. Some of my best pictures were taken with K25 in my post school days when my entire kit consisted of an OM1, 135, 50 and 28. mike < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM sure right, Gordon J. Ross |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Is there anything more to say? (was: OM sure right), Garry Lewis |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 100 vs 85 (was Another Canadian New to Olympus), Henrik Dahl |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 100 vs 85 (was Another Canadian New to Olympus), Earl Dunbar |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |