Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re:Re: [OM] 100 vs 85 (was Another Canadian New to Olympus)

Subject: Re:Re: [OM] 100 vs 85 (was Another Canadian New to Olympus)
From: "Rolf Lockwood" <rolftruck@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:50:18 -0500
Cc: hdahl@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks, Henrik (and others who commented on this one -- getting this 
list in digest form and not having been at the keyboard much these last 
few days, I can't keep up!). It seems clear that the 100 is a good bet, 
not that I expected otherwise. I have both 85 and 105 in my Nikon world 
(and a 90 in my seldom used Leica bag -- anybody want it?) and I find 
they have distinctly different uses, so maybe the "try both" approach is 
right.

But gee whiz, in this post-Xmas moment, that means I'll have to sell 
something. And as we all know only too well, the "sell the one you like 
least" answer is no answer at all. I keep acquiring bits and pieces of 
kit having agreed, with my weak self, to sell the thing it replaces, or 
the thing(s) I hardly ever use, or the thing(s) I really shouldn't have 
bought in the first place. I blame it all on oBoy and KEH and the Web in 
general.

I'm not at all rich, but when I was really dirt poor, photographic life 
was easier in many ways -- one body, a couple of lenses, and I made good 
pictures about as often as I do now. For many years it was just a tired 
old Mamiya C3 with an 80mm lens, and I can still smile with pleasure at 
the work it produced.

Sorry to be so contemplative on a list as fast and crisp and witty as 
this one (I love it, by the way, especially the tolerance for 
interesting OT stuff) but that's what a Sunday afternoon before heading 
back to the grind does to me.

Maybe there's a new thread in there: what single combination of camera 
and lens has produced the pictures you're most proud of? Olympus 
preferably, I guess I have to add, not knowing this list's limits 
perfectly well.

Have a great week, everybody.

Rolf in Toronto

Henrik Dahl wrote on 1/4/2004, 11:24 AM:

 > I sold my 100/2.8 to get a 85/2 instead because the latter had a (for
 > me) more versatile range, greater f-stop and is just so... yummy. The
 > 100 is a great lens too, and (I believe) often a lot cheaper, but IMO
 > the portrait feeling of the 85 is better. But seriously, the pics I
 > took with the 100 are no worse than the ones taken with the 85. Try
 > both out and keep/buy the one you like the most. (Bet it'll be the
 > looovely 85, he he he...)


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz