Re: [OM] OM sure right

[Jeff Keller]

I have to agree even the photo content on the list is sparse ...

I vaguely remember Tamron made the long focal length lenses that could be
broken down into shorter pieces but didn't know that Tokina had also. Does
anybody have great things or even good things to say about them?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2977231203&indexURL=1&photoDisplayType=2#ebayphotohosting

I was going through some of the slides I took last summer looking for some
to print. I found one which doesn't look as sharp as what I've normally
attained with my Tamron 400/4 but I like it. Comments and criticisms
welcomed.
http://jkeller.com/Photos/Birds/cormorants_2.jpg

I think Graham's weekly photos have been great. I'm going to try to make
sure I try to get a good image every week in 2004. The discipline to look
every week for a good image should improve what I see.

-jeff

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike" <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >......Gee, all this in just a few day how nice.
> >
> Actually Dan has a point. When i connect my BS meter  to the digest it
> has been pegged off the chart lately. Mind you i don't mind a bit of OT
> and participate myself.  But the OM content has been pretty sparse of
> late or perhaps it gets buried in the chafe of the digest.  Does this
> mean we aren't out taking pictures? Or maybe interest in OM is on the
wane.
>
> Mike
>

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >