Subject: | [OM] Re: Walt's underwear amendments |
---|---|
From: | andrew fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:22:49 +1100 |
Part of the Bill of Frights then? AndrewF No, it's something about the right to bare arse, I think. AndrewOf course, is there some law that requires retired folk to wear undergarments if they're not going beyond the end of the driveway?I'm sure there's some constitutional amendment that allows you to do that - freedom of expression or some such? AndrewF< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Please, guys.....stop now....Re: [OM] OT Political parties (was Mike Moore, etc.), andrew fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] My photography goals, Richard F. Man |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] [OT]Re: underwear, tOM Trottier |
Next by Thread: | [OM] WTB 38/2.8 and T Power Control 1, Andrew Gullen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |