Isn't that what caused the boxer rebellion?
tOM
On Saturday, December 13, 2003 at 21:39
Andrew Gullen <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No, it's something about the right to bare arse, I think.
>
> Andrew
>
> >> Of course, is there some law that requires retired folk to wear
> >> undergarments if they're not going beyond the end of the driveway?
> >>
> >
> > I'm sure there's some constitutional amendment that allows you to do
> > that - freedom of expression or some such?
> > AndrewF
---- Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur ----
,__@ tOM Trottier +1 613 231-6115
_-\_<, 758 Albert St.,Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
(*)/'(*) N45.412 W75.714
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too
much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.
-Thomas Jefferson 1743-1826)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|