Earl,
I know of two 3rd party processors of K14/Kodachrome, both have a very
good reputation. http://dwaynesphoto.com/direct/ and
http://www.aandi.com/trans.html .
Jim Couch
Earl Dunbar wrote:
Is E-K the only one who now processes Kodachrome? Used to be 3rd parties did
it in the US, but in Canada we only had EK, because the anti-combine (monopoly)
laws were different. That said, whenever I had critical K14 to process in
either country, I wanted it to go to Kodak.
Earl
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 11/11/2003 at 5:09 PM Siddiq wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:27:03 -0800 (PST), Donald Shedrick
<shedridc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Before the introduction of Velvia in the early 90's, Kodachrome 25
and 64 was by far the dominant film of pros for things like NG. It
was the best available, and still is an excellent film for natural
(not enhanced) color.
indeed. that's what struck me, the current NGs have IN YOUR FACE color for
a lot of the photos, the old ones were subtle. if kchrome processing wasnt
such a whacko operation by kodak, i'd shoot it. as it stands, i go fuji
NPH exclusively.
--
/S
aim:iddibhai
icq:104079359
msidd004atstudentdotucrdotedu
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|