Is E-K the only one who now processes Kodachrome? Used to be 3rd parties did
it in the US, but in Canada we only had EK, because the anti-combine (monopoly)
laws were different. That said, whenever I had critical K14 to process in
either country, I wanted it to go to Kodak.
Earl
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 11/11/2003 at 5:09 PM Siddiq wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:27:03 -0800 (PST), Donald Shedrick
><shedridc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Before the introduction of Velvia in the early 90's, Kodachrome 25
>> and 64 was by far the dominant film of pros for things like NG. It
>> was the best available, and still is an excellent film for natural
>> (not enhanced) color.
>
>indeed. that's what struck me, the current NGs have IN YOUR FACE color for
>a lot of the photos, the old ones were subtle. if kchrome processing wasnt
>such a whacko operation by kodak, i'd shoot it. as it stands, i go fuji
>NPH exclusively.
>
>--
>/S
>aim:iddibhai
>icq:104079359
>msidd004atstudentdotucrdotedu
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|