Subject: | Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs conventional lenses |
---|---|
From: | "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:24:59 -0800 |
>-----Original Message----- >From: Walt Wayman >And, C.H., with all them f/2 lenses, where's yer 50/2 and 180/2? >I've got one, but not the other, and I'll trade the one I've got >for the one I don't. :-) > >Walt > Am I missing something here Walt? Doesn't this still leave you with 'one and not the other'?? My 'new math' may be failing me here. Jim < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] E-1 first impressions, B. D. Colen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] E-1 first impressions, B. D. Colen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs conventional lenses, C.H.Ling |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs conventional lenses, Walt Wayman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |