Well we know Oly can't compete with Canon and Nikon in utilizing there
35mm lens for digital, thats more than 187,000 MPH
XDan
You have some really strange definition of "light year!" I'd hardly call
6.3 mgp v 5 mgp a "light year.";-)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Danrich
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 6:09 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 review
Yea ha ha a trap!
When it comes to digital, Canon is light years ahead for now. XDan
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 12:02 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 review
Don't answer!
Leia: "Luke, It's a trap!"
From: "Danrich" <danrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> What are you considering a piece of junk?
> XDan
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|