You have some really strange definition of "light year!" I'd hardly call
6.3 mgp v 5 mgp a "light year.";-)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Danrich
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 6:09 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 review
Yea ha ha a trap!
When it comes to digital, Canon is light years ahead for now. XDan
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 12:02 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 review
Don't answer!
Leia: "Luke, It's a trap!"
From: "Danrich" <danrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> What are you considering a piece of junk?
> XDan
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|