Subject: | Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs. conventional lenses - fact or hype? |
---|---|
From: | "Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu" <lamadoo@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:57:24 -0400 |
I think the advanced amateur world simply needs a full-frame 3MP sensor with large pixels, personally. If each pixel was large, we'd have low noise and low-light capability, right? It must be hard to make because it seems obvious but noone's doing it that way. Lama < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] See ya, ll . clark |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Photshop question, follow up, B. D. Colen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs. conventional lenses - fact or hype?, B. D. Colen |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs. conventional lenses - fact or hype?, Julian Davies |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |