ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OT, Fame at last

Subject:	Re: [OM] OT, Fame at last - perhaps ;-)
From:	NSURIT@xxxxxxx
Date:	Thu, 2 Oct 2003 16:21:06 EDT

In a message dated 10/2/03 2:30:57 PM Central Daylight Time, 
ll.clark@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> >Although this is not a huge lens, it is big enough to also have a  pretty
> >nice macho range. 
> 
> Aha! That explains those beat-up insects I see from time to time in
> photos.
> 
> 

Si.  8^)  Bill Barber

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), (continued) Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Some of my first [OM] pics back..., c andrew chadwick Re: Some of my first [OM] pics back..., Danrich Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Moose Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Fernando Gonzalez Gentile [OM] Tamron 60-300, was Fame at last, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Tamron 60-300, was Fame at last, Moose Re: [OM] OT, Fame at last - perhaps ;-), fred42 Re: [OM] OT, Fame at last - perhaps ;-), NSURIT <= Re: [OM] OT, Fame at last - perhaps ;-), John A. Lind Re: [OM] OT, Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Chris Barker Re: [OM] OT, Fame at last - perhaps ;-), John A. Lind

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] OM to E-1 adapter - a slightly different reply from Tokyo, John Hermanson
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: OT Carousel Projectors, John Hermanson
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OT, Fame at last - perhaps ;-), fred42
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OT, Fame at last - perhaps ;-), John A. Lind
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OT, Fame at last - perhaps ;-)