The 300mm f2.8 seems like one of the lenses that would be easier to
replace with say a Tamron 300/2.8. Neither the two zoom lenses, nor the
macro have OM equivalents (14-54 f2.8/3.5, 50-200 f2.8/3.5, 50 macro).
-jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <NSURIT@xxxxxxx>
>
> My only concern right now is that as a confirmed Zuikohead/Zuikoholic,
I know
> I'll need the 300mm f2.8. What a kick butt lens! Never wanted or
needed any
> of the "Big Whites", however this one is a "must have" lens. Does any
other
> manufacturer make anything in digital that even approaches this? I
don't
> think so.
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|