Subject: | Re: [OM] 300/2.8 (My name is bill and I'm an enabler) |
---|---|
From: | Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:58:11 -0700 |
Mike said: > ....and the bokeh is pretty good but not 85/2 class.... > Walt responded: >...Personally, I think the bokeh is great, particularly at f/2.8 and f/4.... > Walt, I may not be comparing apples to apples. Could this just be the difference between f2 and f2.8? I'll do some more scientific research on the matter :>) Mike < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: possible data mining from OM list, Garth Wood |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] My name is bill and I'm an enabler, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] OT: possible data mining from OM list, John Hudson |
Next by Thread: | Re: FW: [OM] T32 is not firing at 1/60 but at 1/30 downwards, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |