Albert,
If you're looking for low-light handheld results, 35 is the answer. Not only
do you have faster lenses, but also a wealth of film options unheard of in
120.
Now, I shoot a lot of MF, and a lot of that hand-held, so I'm somewhere
between you and Tom, and I think MF has a lot of advantages, but not low
light work.
If I was looking there, and I wasn't happy with the OM and one of the fast
lenses, I would consider one of the new Voightlander RF's.
Bill Pearce
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|