Subject: | Re: [OM] negative films, minilabs, etc. |
---|---|
From: | Siddiq <iddibhai@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:13:47 -0700 |
CH Ling, that wasn't a super good exposure to start with (fill ratio of 1:2 flash to ambient) and no rock solid support etc. basically the scan was to demonstrate the lack of sharpening artifacts. you mention that it looked flat, well, NPZ was chosen specifically for super wide latitude (even if it means compressed highs) :) -- /S AIM: iddibhai ICQ: 104079359 < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Minolta 5400, was CH Ling's Portrait shots, Dick Lague |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] RE: [OT negative films, minilabs, etc., Danrich |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] negative films, minilabs, etc., AG Schnozz |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] negative films, minilabs, etc., C.H.Ling |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |