I do too.
One corridor (hang on, I have only one corridor) has 2 A3 prints
hanging - one Gairloch in Scotland, one of the Alhambra and new moon.
These were both Provia with an OM4.
If I let them dry before putting them next to glass, the prints are
indistinguishable from photo prints.
I might have a go with the "joiners" Tom...
Chris
On Saturday, Aug 16, 2003, at 02:58 Europe/London, Tom Scales wrote:
Brian,
I have many, many Inkjet prints hanging around the house (alright,
they're
really in storage right now). Everything from 31/2x5 to 26x38. From
the
normal viewing distance, I don't see any visible difference between
them and
a 'real' print. Perhaps if I held them side by side....
Even my wife was surprised. I told her I was going to decorate the
house
with my own photography and she out and out laughed at me. I bought
nice
frames, proper matting and printed the ones I liked. She ended up
being
really pleased (OK, the flower shots she liked the best were in the
bathroom).
The ones that blew my mind were the 26x38. The Epson printer driver
has the
ability to take an image and 'cut it' into pieces, either 2 x 2 or 3 x
3.
Using 2 x 2 and 13x19 inch paper results in a nice poster size print.
It
prints with cut lines were you trim it. All I did was tape it with
scotch
tape on the back and frame it (I've done three so far). Two are very
much
enlarged flowers (90/2, of course) and one is a shot of the San Antonio
Riverwalk (21/2). If you stand 6 inches in front, you can see it is
four
images. From a few feet back (6-8 feet is the best viewing distance),
the
cuts disappear and they images just blow you away. The one in the
dining
room is a large red flower and the color is so bright it is almost
three
dimensional. The one in the bedroom is a white hibiscus. After it had
been
up for awhile I noticed what I thought, at first, was a blemish about
the
size of a penny. Then I realized it was the shadow of the stamen of the
flower -- perfectly formed.
It is expensive to print using inkjets. For small prints, it cannot
match
the Costco, except I have TOTAL control over the process. I have a
wonderful
piece of software that takes multiple images and arranges them on a
larger
piece of paper, so that makes it much more economical. The 4x6 paper
is much
more expensive, per print, than the 8 1/2 x 11 or 11x17 properly used.
As said before, above 8 x 10, the inkjet shines. The real comparison
isn't
the Frontier or the Costco enlargements, it is the pro lab that will
charge
big bucks. I literally have a darkroom, of sorts, for color -- which
was
always an unrealistic dream. And no chemicals!
Now I have the best of both worlds. High quality digital pics, plus my
OM
equipment and a 4000dpi film scanner. As much as I like the D100, and
I do,
it's never going to do posters.
Tom
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|